RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-01762
XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
Her Fitness Assessment (FA) dated 4 Oct 11 be declared void and removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS).
Her FA dated 7 Feb 12 be corrected in AFFMS to reflect a pregnancy exemption. (Administratively corrected by AFPC)
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
She had a medical condition which precluded her from obtaining an overall satisfactory rating on her contested FA, dated 4 Oct 11.
After the birth of her daughter on 10 Feb 11 she had a medical condition that caused excessive menstrual bleeding. This bleeding continued until 27 Sep 11, when she had a Dilation and Curettage (D&C), a surgical procedure to get the bleeding to stop. During that time, she was on a profile that did not allow her to exercise, because it made the bleeding worse. On 4 Oct 11, right after the procedure, she participated in an Abdominal Circumference (AC) only FA and failed due to her medical condition and inability to exercise.
The applicants complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.
________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant is currently serving in the Regular Air Force in the grade of technical sergeant (E-6).
On 4 Oct 11, the applicant participated in a FA, attaining an overall composite score of 10.00, which constituted an unsatisfactory assessment. The applicant was credited with the following component scores: Cardio Exempt, Abdominal Circumference 39.50/2.00 points, Push-ups Exempt, Sit-ups Exempt.
The applicants last 5 FA results are as follows:
Date
Composite Score
AC Measurement
Rating
13 Dec 2013
0.00
37.50/0.00
Unsatisfactory
1 May 2013
Exempt
Exempt
Exempt
7 Feb 2012
Exempt
Exempt
Exempt
12 Jan 2012
Exempt
Exempt
Exempt
*4 Oct 2011
10.00
39.50/2.00
Unsatisfactory
*Contested FA
As a result of the 26 Sep 13 advisory opinion the applicants records were administratively corrected to show she was exempt from all components of the 7 Feb 12 FA. As such, on 24 Nov 13, the FAAB considered the only issue remaining the 4 Oct 11 FA.
On 24 Nov 2013, a similar request was considered and denied by the Fitness Assessments Appeals Board (FAAB) due to Insufficient evidence to support contention.
________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial of removal of the 4 Oct 11 FA, due to insufficient evidence to support the applicants contention. After reviewing the claim it was determined that the applicant did not provide documentation from the medical provider stating how her medical situation contributed to her 4 Oct 11 FA failure. Additionally, there is no documentation from the Unit Commander indicating his/her decision to invalidate the 4 Oct 11 FA.
Her records were administratively corrected to show that she was exempt from participating in the 7 Feb 12 FA, due to pregnancy.
A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSIM evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit B.
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation, with attachments, was forwarded to the applicant on 10 Jan 14 for review and comment within 30 days. As of this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit C).
_______________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of error or injustice for the FA dated 4 Oct 11. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. In this respect, we note the applicants submission does not contain any supporting medical documentation describing her medical condition and how it prevented her from successfully completing the contested 4 Oct 11 FA. Should the applicant provide medical documentation that would demonstrate the nature of her medical condition and a causal relationship between it and her inability to successfully complete the contested FA and provide a copy of the Fitness Screening Questionnaire, we would be willing to entertain her request for reconsideration of her appeal. However, in view of the above and in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to void the 4 Oct 11 FA.
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the FA dated 4 Oct 11, did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; and the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.
________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2013-01762 in Executive Session on 27 Mar 14, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
Ms. XXXXXX, Chair
Ms. XXXXXX, Vice Chair
Ms. XXXXXX, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 15 Mar 12, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Memorandum, AFPC/DPSIM, dated 24 Nov 13, w/atchs.
Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 10 Jan 14.
XXXXXXX
Chair
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY PRIVACY ACT OF 1974
3
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY PRIVACY ACT OF 1974
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY PRIVACY ACT OF 1974
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01360
On 24 Nov 2013, a similar request was considered and denied by the Fitness Assessments Appeals Board (FAAB) due to Insufficient evidence to support contention. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial of removal of the 4 Oct 11 FA, due to insufficient evidence to support the applicants contention. Her records were administratively corrected to show that she was exempt from participating in the 7 Feb 12 FA, due to...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04605
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-04605 XXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Fitness Assessment (FA) dated 12 Sep 13 be declared void and removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). _______________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 20 Mar...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02580
A list of the applicants complete FA history is as follows: Date Composite Score Cardio Rating 4 Aug 2013 33.00 17:41/0.00 Unsatisfactory *5 May 2013 26.50 INC/0.00 Unsatisfactory 14 May 2012 91.70 12:19/57.60 Satisfactory * Contested FA On 16 Dec 13, a similar request was considered and denied by the Fitness Assessments Appeals Board (FAAB), on the basis of Insufficient evidence; specifically AF Form 422 and medical...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03078
A list of the applicants last five FA results is as follows: Date Composite Score Cardio Rating 19 Aug 13 88.75 Exempt Satisfactory 13 May 13 35.60 15:45/0.00 Exempt 8 Nov 12 92.00 Exempt Excellent 14 Aug 12 28.80 18:01/0.00 Unsatisfactory 16 Feb 12 91.75 Exempt Excellent *26 Nov 11 42.30 16:49/8.30 Unsatisfactory *26 Jul 11 35.70 18:52/0.00 Unsatisfactory 31 Jan 11 84.00 Exempt Satisfactory 25 Nov 10 27.50 Incomplete/0.00 Unsatisfactory 24 May 10 78.00 13:11/36.00 Good *Contested FA On 14...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04714
He also provided a memorandum from the medical provider dated 01 Jul 13, that validated he had a medical condition that precluded him from passing the 19 Jun 13 FA and then was issued an AF Form 469. In regards to the FA dated 19 Jun 13, we recognize the letter from his medical provider, which states that a medical condition prevented him from passing. Furthermore, the applicant contends that since the FAs dated 31 July 12 and 28 Dec 12 now reflect a passing score in AFFMS and the FAs...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05443
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05443 XXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Fitness Assessments (FAs) dated 17 Dec 12, 15 Mar 13, and 12 Jun 13 be declared void and removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). In support of his appeal the applicant submits; a Medical Determination letter,...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04939
Once her evaluation was complete, her medical provider indicated on the AF Form 108, Physical Fitness Education and Intervention Processing, that her medical condition prevented her from passing the Abdominal Circumference (AC) component of the test and precluded her from obtaining an overall passing score. DPSIM references AFI 36-2905, Fitness Program AFGM 5 (dated 3 Jan 13) stating that while the applicant had a documented medical condition that precluded her from passing, the...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02738
As a result we have concluded that the recorded AC scores are not an accurate reflection of applicant's abdominal circumference. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation, with attachment, was forwarded to the applicant on 6 Dec 13 for review and comment within 30 days. The applicant has provided documentation validating he had a medical condition that affected his ability to pass the AC...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04682
The applicants last 5 FA results are as follows: Date Composite Score Cardio Rating 30 Oct 13 82.75 Exempt Satisfactory 28 Aug 13 32.60 32/0.00(1-mile walk) Unsatisfactory *13 Aug 13 71.75 Exempt Unsatisfactory 13 Feb 13 87.00 Exempt Satisfactory 7 Aug 12 80.20 15:52/44.10 Satisfactory * Contested FA A similar request was denied by the Fitness Assessment Appeals Board (FAAB) on 14 Feb 14 on the basis of no letter from the commander to invalidate the Fitness Assessment. Also, no AF Form...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03235
The applicants last 10 FA results are as follows: Date Composite Score Push Ups Rating 23 Aug 13 92.63 Exempt Excellent 29 May 13 21.38 Exempt Unsatisfactory 5 Feb 13 84.10 21/6.00 Unsatisfactory 19 Jul 12 79.67 22/6.30 Satisfactory 13 Mar 12 Exempt Exempt Exempt 21 Oct 11 85.00 19/5.50 Satisfactory *6 Sep 11 73.67 18/5.00 Unsatisfactory *20 Jul 11 81.00 16/4.30 Unsatisfactory 5 Nov 10 96.25 Exempt Excellent 14 May 10 75.20 25/8.00 Good *Contested FA On 14 Feb 14, a similar request was...